Homepage

Elvis

Santa

Global

CAFCASS
Anti-Dad
Attack

ProtestArt

Latest Demo

SHAME
In 2001, after Munby jailed Mark Harris for 10 months, hundreds protested outside Munby's home at 13 Ravensden Street, London SE11 4AQ. This started the militant protests against the secret Family Courts.

April 2004: Family Court Judge Munby launches an extraordinary attack on the family justice system for failing separated fathers and their children. He said he was ashamed.

We can not explain Munby's outburst. He keeps the facts secret. If, like Pelling, we discuss the details, we will be jailed for 2 years. To explain how Munby can rubbish an institution he worked hard to create, we must go back to a previous scandal where Munby himself went public.
Munby now says that mothers who cut off children from fathers should be jailed for 3 days. Is Munby now ashamed of jailing Mark Harris for 10 months for saying what Munby himself now says? 
`

   
 
23 MARCH 2001:
Judge Munby
sends
Mark Harris

to jail for 10 months.
Read in detail how Judge Munby justifies sending a father to four months for giving the children birthday presents, and 2 moths for waving 'hallo'.
Read Munby's order
(28/04/2001)
Judge brands 'martyr' father as a charlatan

By Joshua Rozenberg

A FATHER who "cast himself as a martyr" in a high-profile legal battle over his three daughters was described by a High Court judge yesterday as an "unprincipled charlatan" who should have no direct contact with them.

Mr Justice Munby said the children's welfare was best served by them having no direct contact with Mark Harris, 42, a driving instructor from Plymouth. He referred to one of a number of demonstrations by supporters of Mr Harris outside the homes of various judges. The demonstrations were publicised on the internet.

Posters were displayed criticising Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, president of the Family Division. One read: "If BSE-infected meat is bad for kids . . . why is this mad cow in charge of Family Courts?"

Mr Justice Munby, sitting in the Family Division in London, said: "No amount of intimidation, whether demonstrating outside their homes, vilifying them on the internet or bombarding them with offensive letters, will have any effect on the judges or their families, or deflect the judges from their sworn duty to do right to all manner of people without fear or favour affection or ill-will, or alter their approaches to the cases they are called upon to try."

The judge said Mr Harris's daughters lived with their mother following her divorce from him. The daughters wanted and enjoyed contact with their father. The judge said that the mother did not significantly oppose contact, but "all three daughters have ended up opposed to and refusing to participate".

He said: "Mr Harris is the author of his own immense misfortune. He is also, even though he probably cannot recognise it, the cause of the blighting of his daughters' lives." The mother and children have been left, he said, with a "beleaguered feeling of being stalked and harassed".

The judge said one reason he was giving his ruling in open court was that the case had been promoted as a cause celebre both by Mr Harris and by a number of campaigning organisations, including Families Need Fathers, the Equal Parenting Council, the UK Men's Movement and the group set up by Mr Harris himself, Dads Against Discrimination.

Mr Justice Munby said: "Mr Harris has cheerfully cast himself and allowed and encouraged others to cast him in the role of martyr. I believe there is a public interest in the members of these organisations knowing just how they have been bamboozled and cynically manipulated by a man, devoid of all moral scruple, who is singularly ill-suited either to assume the martyr's crown or to act as an ambassador for such organisations.

"Mr Harris has manipulated the press by feeding it tendentious accounts of these proceedings, enabled to do so because he has been able hypocritically to shelter behind the very privacy of the proceedings which hitherto has prevented anyone correcting his misrepresentations."

Mr Harris, who is serving a 10-month sentence for contempt of court, was in court for the ruling, as were a number of his supporters. The judge rejected an application by Mr Harris to "purge" his contempt and release him from prison "to start with a clean sheet".

Source:Daily Telegraph

munby the jailing judge

June 2001: Mark Harris comments on Judge Munby's order

It should be noted that throughout the period these heinous crimes were committed, I had a contact order for unsupervised contact.

Someone should explain as to why the mother breaching the Contact order (see breach (2) ) attached no penalty for her at all, but got me 4 months for trying to bribe her to comply with the order ?

And, perhaps someone can tell me the logic of giving me four months for giving the children birthday presents on an unsupervised contact (breach 4). ?

I think this particular piece of Judicial abuse of power should be recorded for future history.

Mark Harris

Link:

April 2004: Family Court Judge Munby launches an extraordinary attack on the family justice system for failing separated fathers and their children. He said he was ashamed.
Read about Munby's extra-ordinary outburst.

"It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more completely deprive the nation of its benefits than is done by its abandoned prostitution to falsehood."
-- Thomas Jefferson to John Norvell, 1807 --

"I deplore... the putrid state into which our newspapers have passed and the malignity, the vulgarity, and mendacious spirit of those who write for them... These ordures are rapidly depraving the public taste and lessening its relish for sound food. As vehicles of information and a curb on our funtionaries, they have rendered themselves useless by forfeiting all title to belief... "
-- Thomas Jefferson to Walter Jones (1814) ==



o..©MMIII
fathercare.org

Mark- read latest news about the father who  went to Courts more than 115 times
Site
Meter