Anti male Anti sexism policyOFFICIAL
POLICY
FOR
OFFICERS
DEALING WITH
DIVORCING
PARENTS
IN ENGLAND



[ OCR version of complete booklet available here]

What's this got to do with fathers after divorce
The Real Power behind CAFCASS

The following are extracts from NAPO's ANTI-SEXISM POLICY POLICY :


"THE NATURE AND IMPACT OF SEXISM:
WHY POLICIES AND STRATEGIES ARE NECESSARY

"The structuring of society has been based on patriarchal assumptions in which, through the process of paternity, there is male control over women, children and the family as an institution. These assumptions extend through all social relations into the institutions of capitalism, the education system, the health services, the criminal justice system and the welfare state. Patriarchy has been the back drop against which all women have been subordinated and ignored."
...

"The impact on women of the patriarchal state has been to subjugate, to silence, to trivialise, to exploit, to intimidate and to oppress."
...

"For NAPO members the position of women in all social structures is relevant to the experience of members and the work of the union. The position of women in the criminal and civil justice systems as clients or workers and the position of women in the trade unions are all casually interwoven with wider socio economic structures. Challenges to the oppression of women in the courts or as employees must be reinforced by challenges to ways of seeing and challenging wider structures."

NAPO COMMITTEE

"NAPO Equal Rights Committee was established in 1983 and gender issues became one of its main responsibilities. ... In 1988 NAPO AGM passed a resolution calling for the urgent establishment of an Anti Sexism Monitoring Committee ..."

"After a lively internal debate it was resolved in 1989, that this committee would be a women only group because it was agreed that women working in NAPO needed to progress together through continuing barriers between women, in terms of sexual orientation, race and disability in order to challenge effectively the male oppression of women. The Anti Sexism Monitoring Committee has been operating since 1989. Its role has been almost exclusively one of monitoring to ensure that NAPO policies, strategies and activities are conducted so as to challenge sexism and promote the rights of women."

"NAPO has established Anti Sexism Link Officers in every branch in order to monitor local activity."


Comment by Fathercare

It is a little known fact that a trade union, NAPO, rather than the employer of the trade unionists -- now CAFCASS -- has been allowed to prescribe a set of guidelines for operatives to follow when writing reports about children for courts.

It is even more disturbing that reports guided by the NAPO ANTI SEXISM POLICY are so secret that their publication, or even the mere showing of the report to friends , results in UK government officials issuing threats of legal proceedings carrying a prison sentence of up to 2 years in jail.

The public needs to know what caused people to take pride as they set about in secret courts creating a generation of fatherless children in all our name.

Domestic Violence

NAPO defines domestic violence thus:

"Domestic violence involves the perpetration of violence by a more powerful person against a less powerful person. It is defined as assault, abuse or harassment which occurs between persons who have a sexual, familial or other close personal relationship. Generally, domestic violence is perpetrated by men against women.

...  Violence by women against adult males is rare and therefore unlikely to fall within this definition."

WOMEN IN THE FAMILY COURT SYSTEM

"The Family Court system shores up the traditional role of women in the family and makes assumptions which are rarely challenged about her role as carer, peacemaker, and homemaker. In our work as Family Court workers NAPO members play a very significant role in relation to the experience of women in families and as carers."

[ Women represent a mere 15 % of the of criminal justice statistics  but] "the probation service is alone in employing approximately equal numbers of women and men, ......... Moreover, since 1994, the Home Office has begun to challenge the equality of recruitment into the probation service." ...

POLICY OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS: The Family Court System

(a) "To develop and promote policies and strategies which strengthen and enhance the ability of women to make and carry out choices within separating families.

(b) To develop and implement policies and strategies which challenge the experience of oppression of all women in separating families.

(c) To support the rights of lesbians as mothers and carers.

(d) To develop policies and strategies which challenge the discrimination against women in contested residence and contact decisions."

(e) ... .

(f) "To develop and promote training strategies which strengthen the anti discriminatory perspective of family court work."


source reference
source reference
source reference
source reference
source reference
source reference
source reference

NAPO booklet in full click here.

"Napo defines domestic violence as the perpetration of violence by a more powerful person against a less powerful person."

small woman abusing powerful man


Napo CAFCASS reporter:

"No, your honour.

I can not see any small women abusing the more powerful man."

napo manMore Protest Galeries 

See also:

Blame the law and not black fathers

Blame the Law and not Black Fathers


UK Government fights to keep up the barriers that separate black fathers from their children.

Read more


Link: Pelling Laws LJ

UPDATE Tuesday October 5, 2004:
Tories push for family court shake-up to help children

The Tories pledged today to scrap the beleaguered family court service in a bid to ensure fathers and grandparents get better access to their children.

"Too many families have been torn apart by bitter disputes about contact
with the children, with parents and grandparents prevented from seeing
their children or their grandchildren.

Too many families end up fighting it out in court and it is the children
who loose out most.

"When we passed the Children Act, we wanted to make it easier for parents to
share in their children's upbringing after divorce. The Act had good
intentions but sadly it hasn't always worked well.

Normal parents are being prevented from caring for their children. In some
cases prevented from seeing their children at all. We believe that the best
parent is both parents.

That is why, in my first month in Government, I will publish a Bill to give
a presumption of co- parenting and a right for both parents to be involved
in bringing up their children, when couples separate. We will ensure that
the law serves the best interests of the child - and children deserve to
see both parents.

Ms May called the introduction of Cafcass under Labour "the biggest mistake in family policy", and said her party would seek to abolish it to end "the heartbroken stories" of parents denied fair access to their kids.

"It is a bureaucratic shambles, it is deeply unjust and it is letting families down," she said. ...

The body has been beset with problems since the decision to abolish the self-employed status of guardians, which led to many leaving the service.

Ms May said that within the first month of a Tory government, a bill would be drawn up giving a "presumption of co-parenting and a right for both parents to be involved in bringing up their children where couples separate".

"We will ensure that the law serves the best interest of the child - and children deserve to see both parents."

She added: "Courts should be the last resort, not the first. The aim will be to intervene early to make sure disputes don't have to go to court but are sorted out quickly in the best interests of the children."

...
Site
Meter     CAFCASS IN THE NEWS

Napo attacks voices critical of its role in CAFCASS

Homepage

© fathercare2003