|
The Real Power behind CAFCASS |
The following are extracts from NAPO's ANTI-SEXISM POLICY
POLICY : |
"The structuring of society has
been based on patriarchal assumptions in which, through the process
of
paternity, there is male control over women, children and the family
as an institution. These assumptions extend through all social relations
into the institutions of capitalism, the education system, the health
services, the criminal justice system and the welfare state. Patriarchy
has been the back drop against which all women have been subordinated
and ignored." "The impact on women of the patriarchal
state has been to subjugate, to silence, to trivialise, to exploit,
to intimidate and to oppress." "For NAPO members the position of women in all social structures is relevant to the experience of members and the work of the union. The position of women in the criminal and civil justice systems as clients or workers and the position of women in the trade unions are all casually interwoven with wider socio economic structures. Challenges to the oppression of women in the courts or as employees must be reinforced by challenges to ways of seeing and challenging wider structures."
Domestic Violence NAPO defines domestic violence thus: "Domestic violence involves the perpetration of violence by a more powerful person against a less powerful person. It is defined as assault, abuse or harassment which occurs between persons who have a sexual, familial or other close personal relationship. Generally, domestic violence is perpetrated by men against women. ... Violence by women
against adult males is rare and therefore unlikely to fall within
this definition." WOMEN IN THE FAMILY COURT SYSTEM "The Family Court system shores up the traditional role of women in the family and makes assumptions which are rarely challenged about her role as carer, peacemaker, and homemaker. In our work as Family Court workers NAPO members play a very significant role in relation to the experience of women in families and as carers." [ Women represent a mere 15 % of the of criminal justice statistics but] "the probation service is alone in employing approximately equal numbers of women and men, ......... Moreover, since 1994, the Home Office has begun to challenge the equality of recruitment into the probation service." ... POLICY OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS: The Family Court System (a) "To develop and promote policies and strategies which strengthen and enhance the ability of women to make and carry out choices within separating families. (b) To develop and implement policies and strategies which challenge the experience of oppression of all women in separating families. (c) To support the rights of lesbians as mothers and carers. (d) To develop policies and strategies which challenge the discrimination against women in contested residence and contact decisions." (e) ... . (f) "To develop and promote training strategies which strengthen the anti discriminatory perspective of family court work." |
|
|
|||||||
See
also:
|
| UPDATE Tuesday October 5, 2004: Tories push for family court shake-up to help children The Tories pledged today to scrap the beleaguered family court service in a bid to ensure fathers and grandparents get better access to their children. "Too many families have been torn apart by bitter disputes
about contact Ms May called the introduction of Cafcass under Labour "the biggest mistake in family policy", and said her party would seek to abolish it to end "the heartbroken stories" of parents denied fair access to their kids. "It is a bureaucratic shambles, it is deeply unjust and it is letting families down," she said. ... The body has been beset with problems since the decision to abolish the self-employed status of guardians, which led to many leaving the service. Ms May said that within the first month of a Tory government, a bill would be drawn up giving a "presumption of co-parenting and a right for both parents to be involved in bringing up their children where couples separate". "We will ensure that the law serves the best interest of the child - and children deserve to see both parents." She added: "Courts should be the last resort, not the first. The aim will be to intervene early to make sure disputes don't have to go to court but are sorted out quickly in the best interests of the children." ... |
|
|
CAFCASS
IN THE NEWS Napo attacks voices critical of its role in CAFCASS |
|||
© fathercare2003 |
||||