Thorpe
finds that it is in the best interests of the children if
their mother permanently ends contact between a father's
children and their father by emigrating with his children
to another country and living with a man resident in that
country who is married to another woman.
London,
July 31, 2003, Court of Appeal
TWO
fathers are to lose regular contact with their children after their
former wives won the right yesterday to take them abroad
with their new partners.
The Court
of Appeal reversed the decisions of county court judges who had
refused the mothers permission to relocate the children,
in one case to South Africa and in the other to Australia.
Lord Justice
Thorpe said that to frustrate "natural emigration" risked the
survival of the new family or blighted its potential for"
fulfilment and happiness".
He said: "Often
there will be a price to be paid in welfare terms by the
diminution of the hildren's contact with their father and
his extended family."
He said
that it was also possible for a father to take employment abroad
after separation or to marry a foreigner and there would
be the same loss of contact.
"These
are the tides of chance and life and in the exercise of its paternalistic
jurisdiction it is important that the court should recognise
the force of these movements and not frustrate them unless they are shown to be contrary to the welfare of the child."
Both cases
involve mothers whose marriages broke down and who want to marry
new partners. None of the parties can be named to protect
the identities of the children.
One of
the mothers, who is 40, married her husband, now 44, in 1986 and
they had two children who are aged 7 and 10. The marriage
began to fall apart in 1999 after the mother
met a wealthy South African businessman. Both
began divorce proceedings in 2002, but although the mother's
divorce comes through next month, her new partner is not yet free to remarry.
In the
second case the 32-year-old mother has a six-year-old child
by her marriage to the 38-year-old father. They were divorced
last year.
The
mother met a Philippines citizen with right of residence
in Australia and they want to set up home
in Perth, where the man has a well-paid job.
Source:
Frances Gibb, Legal Editor The
Times, July 31, 2003,
Mothers can take children to new life
overseas
Judges
in the UK do not have formal training in children's
welfare. Instead in theory they follow the advice given
by Family Court Welfare Officers now part of CAFCASS.
Thorpe
is hotly tipped to succeed Butler-Sloss when she retires
in about 2 years time.
The mood amongst those who have
experienced the UK's Secret Family Court System
- Views expressed by fathers at the time of the Observer's
article. Read
here
The Nuremberg trials have established
that a bureaucrat is responsible for the effects of the bureaucracy
the he willingly works within. Editorial Page - ManKind's Ill Eagle Magazine - 16aug2001
- Click here[110
KB]
Bowlby's
Theory; K. Miller, 2003 --
Page from (banned
in the UK) booklet.
Secret
Court injuncted the author on the grounds that publication is harmful
to
what secret UK Family Courts understand to be the
welfare needs
of children.
Pirated version; on
Canadian site.
Fifty
years of 'Maternal Deprivation' reassessed --
How
effectively does research influence policy and enhance practice in
family court proceedings? Read
here
FATHER'S
ABSENCE INCREASES DAUGHTER'S RISK OF TEEN PREGNANCY
Results
of long-term studies in the United States and in New Zealand
investigating the association
between father absence and early teenage sexual activity
and pregnancy.
The research
was published May 14, 2003 in the Journal Child Development.
For
details about the findings of the research (co-written
by the researchers) visit the website of the Centre For
the
Advancement
of
Health.Click
here